WebApr 1, 2024 · State Consumer Dispute Redressal Comission) and of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Cicily Kallarackal vs. Vehicle Factory). It was further submitted in the written Statements filed by Mr. Navkiran … WebCicily Kallarackal vs. Vehicle Factory, 2012(8) SCC 524 - Referred By. ... Madhuben Wd/o Vinodbhai Mehta VS Prabhatbhai Jivabhai Patel - 22 Jan 21. It is true that the rule of exhaustion of alternative remedy is a rule of discretion and not one of compulsion, but it is difficult to fathom any reason why the High Court should entertain a ...
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA …
WebCICILY KALLARACKAL – Appellant Versus VEHICLE FACTORY – Respondent Decided on : 06.08.2012 (A) National Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Sec. 27-A — Jurisdiction of … WebFeb 15, 2024 · Jharkhand State Housing Board vs Sri Jagdish Prasad Singh on 27 November, 2024 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1862 of 2013 ——— Jharkhand State Housing Board, a Body Corporate created by ... consideration before the Hon’ble Apex Court in Cicily Kallarackal vs. ... iphone ram specs
Madhuben Wd/o Vinodbhai Mehta VS Prabhatbhai Jivabhai Patel
Webattention of the High Court having been drawn to Cicily Kallarackal vs. Vehicle Factory, (2012) 8 SCC 524 without even dealing with or discussing the judgment and the reason … WebSupreme Court in Cicily Kallarackal vs. Vehicle Factory judgment held, “to state in absolute terms that it is not appropriate for the High Courts to entertain writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India … WebMar 15, 2024 · Despite the attention of the High Court having been drawn to Cicily Kallarackal vs. Vehicle Factory, (2012) 8 SCC 524 without even dealing with or discussing the judgment and the reason for its inapplicability, the High Court has chosen to rely upon decision of Single Judge of ... iphone raise to wake